W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publishing-sc@w3.org > October 2018

Re: IDPF, TPI, PBG members

From: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 11:42:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CADxXqOx8ECKgKUBZzsaiznqa=HQt5c7zQOV8nX4Guj6B=NqGLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>, W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Do we know more about the criteria for inclusion on the IDPF members
list? Were these current, paid-up members at the time of the merger?

One of them (Funkerz Publishing Research) is actually a service where
students who don't want to write their papers pay someone else to do
it :)

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:27 AM Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1 Oct 2018, at 17:03, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi PBG SC,
>
> Here is a collated Excel file form the 3 lists : IDPF, TPI and PBG.
>
> Sorry for my ignorance, but could someone bring me light on the differences between TPI and PBG lists ?
> - Some PBG members are not listed in TPI.
> Is it because they are W3C full members (the case of Adobe, Hachette, for instance)?
>
>
> Yes or W3C members that joined W3C on a Business Group level.
>
> Or they registered to the PBG not through the TPI process?
>
> Also some TPI members are not in PBG.
> They may be in PWG, but most of the are nowhere in our Publsihnig@W3C groups…
>
>
> TPI members can join the PWG, so that is not a discriminating factor…
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
> To be discussed.
>
> Luc
> <Members_IDPF_TPI_PBG_2018.xlsx>
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
Received on Monday, 1 October 2018 15:42:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 1 October 2018 15:42:54 UTC