- From: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 18:21:14 +0000
- To: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
This list should be from annual membership paid. But I did pick it form the Web site and not from accountingŠ I don¹t know who can still access to the last official members list. Luc Le 01/10/2018 17:42, « Dave Cramer » <dauwhe@gmail.com> a écrit : >Do we know more about the criteria for inclusion on the IDPF members >list? Were these current, paid-up members at the time of the merger? > >One of them (Funkerz Publishing Research) is actually a service where >students who don't want to write their papers pay someone else to do >it :) > >On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:27 AM Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 1 Oct 2018, at 17:03, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> wrote: >> >> Hi PBG SC, >> >> Here is a collated Excel file form the 3 lists : IDPF, TPI and PBG. >> >> Sorry for my ignorance, but could someone bring me light on the >>differences between TPI and PBG lists ? >> - Some PBG members are not listed in TPI. >> Is it because they are W3C full members (the case of Adobe, Hachette, >>for instance)? >> >> >> Yes or W3C members that joined W3C on a Business Group level. >> >> Or they registered to the PBG not through the TPI process? >> >> Also some TPI members are not in PBG. >> They may be in PWG, but most of the are nowhere in our Publsihnig@W3C >>groupsŠ >> >> >> TPI members can join the PWG, so that is not a discriminating factorŠ >> >> Ivan >> >> >> >> To be discussed. >> >> Luc >> <Members_IDPF_TPI_PBG_2018.xlsx> >> >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C >> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 >>
Received on Monday, 1 October 2018 18:21:39 UTC