W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publishing-sc@w3.org > October 2018

Re: IDPF, TPI, PBG members

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:27:16 +0200
Cc: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5465BC3E-87D0-41AE-8408-E6E71A36C586@w3.org>
To: Luc Audrain <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>


> On 1 Oct 2018, at 17:03, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr <mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>> wrote:
> 
> Hi PBG SC,
> 
> Here is a collated Excel file form the 3 lists : IDPF, TPI and PBG.
> 
> Sorry for my ignorance, but could someone bring me light on the differences between TPI and PBG lists ?
> - Some PBG members are not listed in TPI. 
> Is it because they are W3C full members (the case of Adobe, Hachette, for instance)? 

Yes or W3C members that joined W3C on a Business Group level.

> Or they registered to the PBG not through the TPI process?
> 
> Also some TPI members are not in PBG. 
> They may be in PWG, but most of the are nowhere in our Publsihnig@W3C groups…
> 

TPI members can join the PWG, so that is not a discriminating factor…

Ivan



> To be discussed.
> 
> Luc
> <Members_IDPF_TPI_PBG_2018.xlsx>


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
Received on Monday, 1 October 2018 15:27:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 1 October 2018 15:27:23 UTC