Re: possible regrets for BillM (and Daihei/Junichi?) for Friday's SC call

Hmmm… for some reason I don’t have the call details in my calendar for today.  Can someone forward?

-Rick


From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 10:47 PM
To: Luc Audrain <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
Cc: Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org>, W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>, Karen L Myers <karen@w3.org>
Subject: Re: possible regrets for BillM (and Daihei/Junichi?) for Friday's SC call
Resent-From: <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 05:46:56 +0000

If we have time, I would also like to talk for a few minutes on our PR strategy (I copy Karen, because she is the real expert). Especially I think we should use our means to talk about the 3.2 work more publicly…

Ivan


On 22 Mar 2018, at 17:26, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr<mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>> wrote:

Hi,

Do we have enough to build an agenda for next PBG call ?

  *   [EPUB Roadmap]: 72h call for consensus to all PBG members [closed]
  *   DPUB Summit in Berlin : more to say ?
  *   EPUBCheck funding : any news ?
  *   Updating of IDPF website to redirect to more up to date resources where needed : more to say ?
  *   Other task force reports[4]:

     *   [EXTERNAL_COORD] call for volunteers : any specific call ?
     *   [A11Y] Status of ISO standardization for a11y ? Specific call results :

        *   Option 1 (PAS): Creating W3C recommendations and then creating ISO/IEC standards via the PAS-submission procedure
        *   Option 2 (Normal process): Parallel development between W3C and ISO/IEC: W3C publishes a Community Group Note, and ISO/IEC publishes standards.
        *   Option 3 (Fast-track): Creating National Standards first (possibly after W3C publication) and then creating ISO/IEC standards via the fas-track procedure
        *   To be continued.

     *   [EPUB_REQS] : nothing new
     *   [BEST_PRACTICES] ?
It was also foreseen that a future PBG call would be on a proper time for Asia and Japan.
Isn’t it the good opportunity then, to share with people of this area what has been already discussed ?

Best,
Luc


De : Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org<mailto:bmccoy@w3.org>>
Société : W3C
Date : jeudi 22 mars 2018 à 01:10
À : 'W3C Publishing Steering Committee' <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
Objet : possible regrets for BillM (and Daihei/Junichi?) for Friday's SC call
Renvoyer - De : <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
Renvoyer - Date : jeudi 22 mars 2018 à 01:11

Hi,

Our Friday PBG SC call (including prep for agenda/announcement of next Tues PBG call) could overlap with end of a late-starting dinner with Japanese publishing stakeholders on Friday night here in Tokyo. Maybe not since I believe the call time (11am ET = UTC 15h) is midnight in Japan but I don’t want to constrain the festivities. More importantly my ability to communicate may be impaired. So I will try to call in but hopefully someone else can lead the charge re: this call and apologies in advance if I don’t make it.

--Bill


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/

mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704