W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-532: Data Model Section [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:08:25 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|40ff8cb266e789749809c51e944d35b1o89B8R08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|504DBC19.8030006@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org

Hi ,

I suggest the following response.

The Working Group has given careful consideration to roles in PROV. We 
allowing roles in all relations. A problem with such a permissive 
approach is that it is not
clear who is playing the role. For instance, if a role is added to 
delegation, which agent is
assuming that role: the delegate or the responsible?  For the example of 
delegation, the group
suggests using the attribute "prov:type" if a subtype of the relation 
needs to be specified,
e.g. contractual delegation.

For a history of the debates: see 
For a group resolution on this matter: see: 
For the final definition: see 

Proposed changes: none.

Thoughts? Comments?


On 09/10/2012 09:55 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-532: Data Model Section   [prov-dm]
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/532
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: prov-dm
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/LC_Feedback#Data_Model_Section_5.7.2.3
> ISSUE-463
> Role should be allowed for delegation so the relationship between the delegate and the responsible entity can be specified.

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 10:08:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:21 UTC