- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:28:36 -0700
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Egon Willighagen <egon.willighagen@gmail.com>
- Message-Id: <376920FF-1C25-43CD-99A4-9460DFABDC5A@rpi.edu>
On Dec 13, 2012, at 1:57 AM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > I think this is a fine rationale but I also think it needs maybe a couple sentences of justification. ? Do you mean add this rationale to the note? > > Also, for the primer, we should think about whether we want to show each serialisation in parallel as this may cause unwanted comparison. I agree that can be an issue with both a RDF/XML and non-RDF XML serialization. Especially since they have the same namespace (!). Perhaps we should just use a TriG serialization for PROV-O in the primer? That ducks the issue about there being 2 XML serializations, which is something we should probably directly address. --Stephan > > regards > Paul > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote: >> PROV-XML is not an RDF/XML serialization and I believe it would be a mistake to create the expectation that it conforms to RDF/XML conventions. Doing so could introduce incorrect assumptions on how PROV-XML maps against PROV-O. PROV-XML was intended as a non-RDF encoding of PROV. For a RDF/XML serialization of PROV use PROV-O. >> >> I believe we went with camelCase in element names because it conformed with PROV-N conventions. We used PascalCase in complexType names to differentiate element and complex type names. In the schema the complexType for entity has name "prov:Entity" and the element you use to reference a prov:Entity from the document root has name "prov:entity". >> >> --Stephan >> >> On Dec 12, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> Resent-From: <p.t.groth@vu.nl> >>>> From: Egon Willighagen <egon.willighagen@gmail.com> >>>> Date: December 12, 2012, 22:56:42 GMT+01:00 >>>> To: "Groth, P.T." <p.t.groth@vu.nl> >>>> Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org> >>>> Subject: Re: Element names in prov-xml >>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >>>>> I've been having a chat with Egon Willighagen in twitter about the element name case in prov-xml. You can see excerpts below. The key question is why element names are lower case e.g <prov:entity ...> and not upper case. This does not correspond to the convention in rdf/xml plus it looks a bit weird when sitting next to the turtle. >>>> >>>> The relevant section in the 2004 RDF/XML spec is 2.13 which describes >>>> the behavior: >>>> >>>> "It is common for RDF graphs to have rdf:type predicates from subject >>>> nodes. These are conventionally called typed nodes in the graph, or >>>> typed node elements in the RDF/XML. RDF/XML allows this triple to be >>>> expressed more concisely. by replacing the rdf:Description node >>>> element name with the namespaced-element corresponding to the RDF URI >>>> reference of the value of the type relationship." >>>> >>>> You can test it with this XML snippet >>>> >>>> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" >>>> xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" >>>> xmlns:prov="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#"> >>>> <prov:entity rdf:about="ex:article"> >>>> <dc:title>Crime rises in cities</dc:title> >>>> </prov:entity> >>>> </rdf:RDF> >>>> >>>> here -> http://www.rdfabout.com/demo/validator/ >>>> >>>> If you 'validate' it, it will also create other formats, showing that >>>> the above RDF/XML has a rdf:type prov:entity ... that confirms that >>>> convention. >>>> >>>> Section 2.13 is not >>>> >>>>> Do we have a good explanation for this? >>>> >>>> Also note that my RDF/XML snippet uses rdf:about rather than prov:id >>>> ... I have to check whether rdf:ID or rdf:about is more appropriate, >>>> but that would be closer to RDF/XML too than prov:id ... but that's a >>>> separate thing you may want to look at. >>>> >>>> Egon >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr E.L. Willighagen >>>> Postdoctoral Researcher >>>> Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT >>>> Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/) >>>> Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ >>>> LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw >>>> Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ >>>> PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers > > > > -- > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | > Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science > - The Network Institute > VU University Amsterdam
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 09:29:06 UTC