- From: martin <martin@ics.forth.gr>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:42:34 +0300
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
We have provenance applications of data capturing and scientific observation in medicine, archaeology and even some in satellite data, and a major application in empirical and synthetic creation of 3D Models by various methods. I regard it as important to include and differentiate sufficiently the event of capturing digital data via devices in a physical environment. Whereas in Digital-to-Digital processing the environment and place of the event plays a neglectable role, the scientific or even forensic interpretation of measured data critically depends on environmental factors, and of analogue characteristics of involved devices. We may even regard the individual history of calibration or degradation of an individual device as relevant. It is not the challenge to register in the provenance data all those factors explicitly per event, but to provide a few core data that can lead the interested user to find such details in other sources. For instance, a date-time, place (geo-reference) and/or the observed object (patient!) may already be sufficient, depending on the case. This would provide the interested scientist with enough clues to find more data about the conditions at that place and time from other sources. Another distinct feature of measurement or digitization events ("acquisition")is that they are by nature terminal in the provenance chain: They are the unique transition from the real to the digital, and all derivatives should include reference to this ultimate source and their circumstances. For instance, an image of Obama typically stays an image of Obama independently from the number of processing steps. So, the reference to the object captured in the initial event is a vital parameter for the whole chain to follow. Querying an provenance chain should ultimately stop at the acquisition event or the invention of data, which may be due to an artistic process, a scientific simulation process or a technical planning process. Therefore reasoning on "terminal" events differs from that about general processing events. To make things as simple as possible, I propose to include the simple taking of a news photo in the journalism example. This is simple, but includes all necessary features to discuss the core concept. It needs not be as weird as : http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crm_core/core_examples/hoagland.htm or http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crm_core/core_examples/henrichsen.htm..... Best, Martin -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 | Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 | | Email: martin@ics.forth.gr | | Center for Cultural Informatics | Information Systems Laboratory | Institute of Computer Science | Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) | | Vassilika Vouton,P.O.Box1385,GR71110 Heraklion,Crete,Greece | | Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl | --------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2011 16:43:05 UTC