- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:34:42 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, PROV-ISSUE-1 PROV-ISSUE-8 PROV-ISSUE-19 On June 7th [1], we agreed on "In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance of an invariant view or perspective on a thing". Putting this in practice turns out to be difficult. While the egg example is interesting, the scenario seems to evolve all the time. Also, I thought that, in a first instance, we may want to look at things that are digital, before seeing how our ideas extend to the non-digital world. Obviously, we have our data journalism example, but we seem to ignore. I think that we ignore it because: - it does not focus on changing things - it is not precise about how information is published/access, - it is quite long (I liked what Simon proposed for this example [2] and this inspired me here) To unblock the situation, I have: - drafted a smaller example [3], focusing on a file being updated - tried to illustrate examples of IVPTs in this example - highlighted an example of IVPT that I don't know how to handle. In this example, it would be good to see - where we have consensus - where we have disagreement - how we handle the outstanding example (i0) of IVPT Feedback by email or on wiki welcome! Cheers, Luc [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Jun/0096.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Jun/0069.html [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/FileExample -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 09:35:21 UTC