Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

• From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
• Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:32:49 +0100
• To: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
• Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <10BEABEF-A25B-4322-A5E9-34FE2143C379@inf.ed.ac.uk>

+1

--James

On Jun 9, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Paul Groth wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the  
> following proposal:
>
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
>
> However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all  
> process executions to specify a duration.
>
> I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
>
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval.  
> Statements denoting this duration are optional."
>
> In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
> this proposal?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>


-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 10:33:19 UTC