- From: Simon Dobson <simon.dobson@st-andrews.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:17:24 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
+1 > On Thursday 09 June 2011 22:27:34 Paul Groth wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following >> proposal: >> >> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval" >> >> However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all >> process executions to specify a duration. >> >> I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows: >> >> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval. >> Statements denoting this duration are optional." >> >> In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for >> this proposal? >> >> Thanks, >> Paul > -- -- Simon Please note my new email address: from now on I will be using simon.dobson@st-andrews.ac.uk
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 08:18:03 UTC