- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 07:48:07 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|ac80c113efc3fc73377069e3371e46f7n567mD08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4DEDC9A7>
Thanks to all for your votes. The proposal is accepted. I think this will allow us to make good progress! Best regards, Luc On 06/06/11 09:22, Luc Moreau wrote: > > Dear all, > > You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal > at the last teleconference: > "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us > to express the provenance > of a thing that does not change". Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed > concerns, which can be > summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things. > > After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged > towards a better > proposal: > > /In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us > to express the provenance of > an invariant view or perspective on a thing./ > > What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does > not change, the thing > itself can be mutable. > > To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for > this proposal? > > Best regards, > Luc > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 06:48:40 UTC