+1 Daniel 2011/6/6 Carl Reed <creed@opengeospatial.org> > +1 > > Carl > > > > > +1 >> >> Luc Moreau wrote: >> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal at >>> the last teleconference: >>> "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to >>> express the provenance >>> of a thing that does not change". Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed >>> concerns, which can be >>> summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things. >>> >>> After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged >>> towards a better >>> proposal: >>> >>> /In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to >>> express the provenance of >>> an invariant view or perspective on a thing./ >>> >>> What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does >>> not change, the thing >>> itself can be mutable. >>> >>> To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for this >>> proposal? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Luc >>> >>> -- >>> Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: >>> +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 >>> 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: >>> l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> United >>> Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >>> >>> >> >> >> > >
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 16:46:56 UTC