- From: Carl Reed <creed@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:08:21 -0600
- To: "Luc Moreau" <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Provenance Working Group WG" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1 Carl > +1 > > Luc Moreau wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal at >> the last teleconference: >> "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to >> express the provenance >> of a thing that does not change". Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed >> concerns, which can be >> summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things. >> >> After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged >> towards a better >> proposal: >> >> /In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to >> express the provenance of >> an invariant view or perspective on a thing./ >> >> What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does >> not change, the thing >> itself can be mutable. >> >> To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for this >> proposal? >> >> Best regards, >> Luc >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science >> tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: >> +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: >> l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> United >> Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >> > > >
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 16:10:03 UTC