Re: PROV-ISSUE-1: a proposal to vote on

+1

Carl



> +1
>
> Luc Moreau wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal at 
>> the last teleconference:
>>  "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to 
>> express the provenance
>> of a thing that does not change".  Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed 
>> concerns, which can be
>> summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things.
>>
>> After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged 
>> towards a better
>> proposal:
>>
>> /In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to 
>> express the provenance of
>> an invariant view or perspective on a thing./
>>
>> What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does 
>> not change, the thing
>> itself can be mutable.
>>
>> To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for this 
>> proposal?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Luc
>>
>> -- 
>> Professor Luc Moreau               Electronics and Computer Science 
>> tel:   +44 23 8059 4487         University of Southampton          fax: 
>> +44 23 8059 2865         Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: 
>> l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>  United 
>> Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>
>
>
> 

Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 16:10:03 UTC