- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 07:46:15 -0700
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4DECE837.6030009@ncl.ac.uk>
being an old DB person, I am not sure what is an "invariant view", but I trust that someone else knows :-) is that what in DB we call a snapshot? +1 -Paolo On 6/6/11 1:22 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > > Dear all, > > You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal at the last teleconference: > "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance > of a thing that does not change". Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed concerns, which can be > summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things. > > After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged towards a better > proposal: > > /In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance of > an invariant view or perspective on a thing./ > > What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does not change, the thing > itself can be mutable. > > To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for this proposal? > > Best regards, > Luc
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 14:46:47 UTC