- From: Myers, Jim <MYERSJ4@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:38:06 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <B7376F3FB29F7E42A510EB5026D99EF2051E4AF3@troy-be-ex2.win.rpi.edu>
+1 From: public-prov-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Luc Moreau Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 4:23 AM To: Provenance Working Group WG Subject: PROV-ISSUE-1: a proposal to vote on Dear all, You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal at the last teleconference: "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance of a thing that does not change". Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed concerns, which can be summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things. After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged towards a better proposal: In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance of an invariant view or perspective on a thing. What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does not change, the thing itself can be mutable. To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for this proposal? Best regards, Luc -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 15:47:30 UTC