- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:22:30 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|c655bdc1e2330bddacf10e8f08bdb61an559MY08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4DEC8E46>
Dear all, You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal at the last teleconference: "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance of a thing that does not change". Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed concerns, which can be summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things. After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged towards a better proposal: /In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance of an invariant view or perspective on a thing./ What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does not change, the thing itself can be mutable. To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for this proposal? Best regards, Luc -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 08:23:03 UTC