- From: Danny Weitzner <djweitzner@csail.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 01:15:00 +0000
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, public-privacy@w3.org
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Message-ID: <CAM5xY4ecxW19ZcHd+j_OVr2LVOd7ZmDuEouvsN9RXOaKen+txw@mail.gmail.com>
further decoding: the EU has no authority over national security matters (ie foreign intelligence gathering) in its member states. Directive Rigo mentions will apply to law enforcement -- a good start, but not sufficient. On Mon Jan 26 2015 at 12:54:41 PM Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> wrote: > On Monday 26 January 2015 9:52:35 David Singer wrote: > > interesting article > > > > <http://www.ecfr.eu/publications/summary/mass_ > surveillance_privacy_and_secur > > ity_europes_confused_response329> > > Decoding: > > The privacy regulation is under way and shall be voted in 2015. But it only > touches on data protection and communications of the private sector. > > There is a parallel "Directive" on data protection in government. Directive > means that it isn't directly nationally applicable (the regulation above > will > be). A Directive needs a national legislative act to be effective. This > Directive touches on the issue of Pervasive Monitoring. There is debate, > but > the debate is somewhat silenced by other issues, like Greece, the war in > Ukraine. Also the freedom of speech against islamist threatening is at the > forefront as you can imagine > > BTW, while the discussion is somewhat low in France, Italy and Greece, the > debate on Pervasive Monitoring is happening in the Netherlands, Germany and > Belgium. There is certainly a tension between what governments would like > to > do and what the population is willing to let them do in terms of > surveillance. > > --Rigo
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 01:15:24 UTC