- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:52:53 +0100
- To: public-privacy@w3.org
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Message-ID: <1603764.HuYCCyVQ6T@hegel>
On Monday 26 January 2015 9:52:35 David Singer wrote: > interesting article > > <http://www.ecfr.eu/publications/summary/mass_surveillance_privacy_and_secur > ity_europes_confused_response329> Decoding: The privacy regulation is under way and shall be voted in 2015. But it only touches on data protection and communications of the private sector. There is a parallel "Directive" on data protection in government. Directive means that it isn't directly nationally applicable (the regulation above will be). A Directive needs a national legislative act to be effective. This Directive touches on the issue of Pervasive Monitoring. There is debate, but the debate is somewhat silenced by other issues, like Greece, the war in Ukraine. Also the freedom of speech against islamist threatening is at the forefront as you can imagine BTW, while the discussion is somewhat low in France, Italy and Greece, the debate on Pervasive Monitoring is happening in the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. There is certainly a tension between what governments would like to do and what the population is willing to let them do in terms of surveillance. --Rigo
Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 20:53:28 UTC