- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:42:00 -0000 (GMT)
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
On Thu, January 2, 2014 6:49 am, Dave Pawson wrote: > Just picking up one scope point Arved ... > IF (big if without a list of deliverables) we produce something like > XSL-FO > from this group, how do you see UI design coming into this groups scope? The difficulty I have with saying that we will produce XSL-FO 2.0 or even a 1.2 is that we have no reasonable expectation that it will be implemented. Expanding on what I just said in reply to Liam, maybe the way forward for XSL-FO is to produce more tutorials and helper libraries to make XSL-FO easier for people to adopt? Or to SWIG [1] xmlroff or even do Antenna House's work for them and SWIG AHF just so there's a XSL-FO formatter available to programmers working in languages other than C or Java? Regards, Tony. [1] http://swig.org/
Received on Thursday, 2 January 2014 12:42:21 UTC