- From: Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:27:02 +1100
- To: "public-poiwg@w3.org" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
@nambor +1 I think #poiwg is much more specific for this group. roBman On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:09 +0100, Dan Brickley wrote: > Hi folks > > Many of us stay in touch via Twitter or similar microblogging > platforms that support simple tagging. > > http://twitter.com/#!/yvonnert/status/1949057358499840 asks > > "@ogc_steven @Brackie2 @danbri @riktem @jeremy_morally @mhaklay > @gothwin @AnttiJakobsson Is there tag or is #POI ok > http://hb.ly/dnpJqi" > > I've suggested we use #poiwg rather than #poi, since > > 1) the former is free; > http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23poiwg&result_type=recent shows > it is unused except for this group's discussions. By contrast > http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23poi seems to mean several things > all at once. > > 2) #poiwg makes it clear we're talking about the standards effort, > rather than tagging some particular point of interest. > > Regarding twitter, I think it's worth the extra couple of chars. But > <shrug/> this is an inexact science :) > > On delicious, http://www.delicious.com/tag/poi has a good pile of > links relating in various ways to 'points of interest'. I've been > using #poiwg there too http://www.delicious.com/tag/poiwg shows I'm > the only one so far doing so. I guess either is fine, I'll probably > use #poiwg when it's particularly about/for this group, and #poi, #geo > etc for more general topics. > > cheers, > > Dan > > -- > http://twitter.com/danbri > http://identi.ca/danbri > http://delicious.com/danbri > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 00:27:42 UTC