- From: 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:47:45 +0900
- To: "Andy Braun" <ajbraun@gmail.com>, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: <public-poiwg@w3.org>
@hollobit +1 -----Original Message----- From: public-poiwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-poiwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andy Braun Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 8:51 PM To: Dan Brickley Cc: public-poiwg@w3.org Subject: Re: suggest #poiwg for twitter/microblog and delicious.com tagging @ajbraun says +1 On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > Hi folks > > Many of us stay in touch via Twitter or similar microblogging > platforms that support simple tagging. > > http://twitter.com/#!/yvonnert/status/1949057358499840 asks > > "@ogc_steven @Brackie2 @danbri @riktem @jeremy_morally @mhaklay > @gothwin @AnttiJakobsson Is there tag or is #POI ok > http://hb.ly/dnpJqi" > > I've suggested we use #poiwg rather than #poi, since > > 1) the former is free; > http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23poiwg&result_type=recent shows > it is unused except for this group's discussions. By contrast > http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23poi seems to mean several things > all at once. > > 2) #poiwg makes it clear we're talking about the standards effort, > rather than tagging some particular point of interest. > > Regarding twitter, I think it's worth the extra couple of chars. But > <shrug/> this is an inexact science :) > > On delicious, http://www.delicious.com/tag/poi has a good pile of > links relating in various ways to 'points of interest'. I've been > using #poiwg there too http://www.delicious.com/tag/poiwg shows I'm > the only one so far doing so. I guess either is fine, I'll probably > use #poiwg when it's particularly about/for this group, and #poi, #geo > etc for more general topics. > > cheers, > > Dan > > -- > http://twitter.com/danbri > http://identi.ca/danbri > http://delicious.com/danbri > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 12:48:06 UTC