- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:09:15 +0100
- To: public-poiwg@w3.org
Hi folks Many of us stay in touch via Twitter or similar microblogging platforms that support simple tagging. http://twitter.com/#!/yvonnert/status/1949057358499840 asks "@ogc_steven @Brackie2 @danbri @riktem @jeremy_morally @mhaklay @gothwin @AnttiJakobsson Is there tag or is #POI ok http://hb.ly/dnpJqi" I've suggested we use #poiwg rather than #poi, since 1) the former is free; http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23poiwg&result_type=recent shows it is unused except for this group's discussions. By contrast http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23poi seems to mean several things all at once. 2) #poiwg makes it clear we're talking about the standards effort, rather than tagging some particular point of interest. Regarding twitter, I think it's worth the extra couple of chars. But <shrug/> this is an inexact science :) On delicious, http://www.delicious.com/tag/poi has a good pile of links relating in various ways to 'points of interest'. I've been using #poiwg there too http://www.delicious.com/tag/poiwg shows I'm the only one so far doing so. I guess either is fine, I'll probably use #poiwg when it's particularly about/for this group, and #poi, #geo etc for more general topics. cheers, Dan -- http://twitter.com/danbri http://identi.ca/danbri http://delicious.com/danbri
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 11:09:52 UTC