W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poiwg@w3.org > November 2010

Re: suggest #poiwg for twitter/microblog and delicious.com tagging

From: Chris Marmo <chris.marmo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:33:14 +1100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimygHg-f_14HXG6LKXF3FK8edmYwSH4CkFvZ3=G@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-poiwg@w3.org
@kurisu +1

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com> wrote:

> @nambor +1
>
> I think #poiwg is much more specific for this group.
>
>
> roBman
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:09 +0100, Dan Brickley wrote:
> > Hi folks
> >
> > Many of us stay in touch via Twitter or similar microblogging
> > platforms that support simple tagging.
> >
> > http://twitter.com/#!/yvonnert/status/1949057358499840 asks
> >
> > "@ogc_steven @Brackie2 @danbri @riktem @jeremy_morally @mhaklay
> > @gothwin @AnttiJakobsson Is there tag or is #POI ok
> > http://hb.ly/dnpJqi"
> >
> > I've suggested we use #poiwg rather than #poi, since
> >
> > 1) the former is free;
> > http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23poiwg&result_type=recent  shows
> > it is unused except for this group's discussions. By contrast
> > http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23poi seems to mean several things
> > all at once.
> >
> > 2) #poiwg makes it clear we're talking about the standards effort,
> > rather than tagging some particular point of interest.
> >
> > Regarding twitter, I think it's worth the extra couple of chars. But
> > <shrug/> this is an inexact science :)
> >
> > On delicious, http://www.delicious.com/tag/poi has a good pile of
> > links relating in various ways to 'points of interest'. I've been
> > using #poiwg there too http://www.delicious.com/tag/poiwg shows I'm
> > the only one so far doing so. I guess either is fine, I'll probably
> > use #poiwg when it's particularly about/for this group, and #poi, #geo
> > etc for more general topics.
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > --
> > http://twitter.com/danbri
> > http://identi.ca/danbri
> > http://delicious.com/danbri
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 01:33:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:48:26 UTC