- From: Chris Marmo <chris.marmo@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:33:14 +1100
- To: public-poiwg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTimygHg-f_14HXG6LKXF3FK8edmYwSH4CkFvZ3=G@mail.gmail.com>
@kurisu +1 On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com> wrote: > @nambor +1 > > I think #poiwg is much more specific for this group. > > > roBman > > > On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:09 +0100, Dan Brickley wrote: > > Hi folks > > > > Many of us stay in touch via Twitter or similar microblogging > > platforms that support simple tagging. > > > > http://twitter.com/#!/yvonnert/status/1949057358499840 asks > > > > "@ogc_steven @Brackie2 @danbri @riktem @jeremy_morally @mhaklay > > @gothwin @AnttiJakobsson Is there tag or is #POI ok > > http://hb.ly/dnpJqi" > > > > I've suggested we use #poiwg rather than #poi, since > > > > 1) the former is free; > > http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23poiwg&result_type=recent shows > > it is unused except for this group's discussions. By contrast > > http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23poi seems to mean several things > > all at once. > > > > 2) #poiwg makes it clear we're talking about the standards effort, > > rather than tagging some particular point of interest. > > > > Regarding twitter, I think it's worth the extra couple of chars. But > > <shrug/> this is an inexact science :) > > > > On delicious, http://www.delicious.com/tag/poi has a good pile of > > links relating in various ways to 'points of interest'. I've been > > using #poiwg there too http://www.delicious.com/tag/poiwg shows I'm > > the only one so far doing so. I guess either is fine, I'll probably > > use #poiwg when it's particularly about/for this group, and #poi, #geo > > etc for more general topics. > > > > cheers, > > > > Dan > > > > -- > > http://twitter.com/danbri > > http://identi.ca/danbri > > http://delicious.com/danbri > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 01:33:48 UTC