- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:48:31 -0500
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, public-pointer-events@w3.org
On 2/5/15 9:45 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > On 05/02/2015 14:29, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> An update on the publication of the Pointer Events Recommendation ... >> >> The comment period ended on January 16 and the review results are >> Member-confidential [1]. Of the 17 W3C Members that replied to the >> proposal to publish the Recommendation, 16 supported publishing the >> specification "as is" and one Member (who is also a member of the >> Pointer Events Working Group) filed a Formal Objection and "suggests the >> document not be published as a Recommendation" (the formal objection is >> Member-confidential [FO] so I can't copy it to this list). >> >> Sorry for the delay; I'll send an update when I know more. > > In principle, what's the process here? Do we get a chance to respond > to the objection? (FWIW point 4 of the objection looks odd/wrong to me) Until such time the FO is Public, I recommend you use the member-pointer-events @ w3.org list for any followups. -Art
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 14:49:01 UTC