- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:45:24 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
On 05/02/2015 14:29, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi All, > > An update on the publication of the Pointer Events Recommendation ... > > The comment period ended on January 16 and the review results are > Member-confidential [1]. Of the 17 W3C Members that replied to the > proposal to publish the Recommendation, 16 supported publishing the > specification "as is" and one Member (who is also a member of the > Pointer Events Working Group) filed a Formal Objection and "suggests the > document not be published as a Recommendation" (the formal objection is > Member-confidential [FO] so I can't copy it to this list). > > Sorry for the delay; I'll send an update when I know more. In principle, what's the process here? Do we get a chance to respond to the objection? (FWIW point 4 of the objection looks odd/wrong to me) P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 14:45:49 UTC