W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Pointer Events Recommendation delayed by a Formal Objection

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:45:24 +0000
Message-ID: <54D38204.9000002@splintered.co.uk>
To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
On 05/02/2015 14:29, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> An update on the publication of the Pointer Events Recommendation ...
>
> The comment period ended on January 16 and the review results are
> Member-confidential [1]. Of the 17 W3C Members that replied to the
> proposal to publish the Recommendation, 16 supported publishing the
> specification "as is" and one Member (who is also a member of the
> Pointer Events Working Group) filed a Formal Objection and "suggests the
> document not be published as a Recommendation" (the formal objection is
> Member-confidential [FO] so I can't copy it to this list).
>
> Sorry for the delay; I'll send an update when I know more.

In principle, what's the process here? Do we get a chance to respond to 
the objection? (FWIW point 4 of the objection looks odd/wrong to me)

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 14:45:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 February 2015 14:45:49 UTC