- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:43:35 -0400
- To: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Hi Philippe, During the October 21 Pointer Events WG call [1], we discussed formal CR testing. The group agreed to try to use the w-p-t "runner" [2] and to put test results in [3] (not yet created). We haven't yet agreed on the structure and format of the Implementation Report. One option we discussed is to use the wptreport tool [4]. Do you recommend using that tool for our Implementation Report (f.ex. see [5])? If not, we would appreciate your recommendations on any other tool to use and/or example Implementation Reports you would recommend us pattern. -Thanks, ArtB [1] <http://www.w3.org/2014/10/21-pointerevents-minutes.html#item04> [2] <http://w3c-test.org/tools/runner/index.html> [3] <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/tree/gh-pages/pointerevents> [4] <https://www.npmjs.org/package/wptreport> [5] <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/IndexedDB/all.html> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: ACTION-141: Check with philippe if the runner test reporting mechanism is ok for cr Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:28:52 +0000 Resent-From: public-pointer-events@w3.org Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:28:51 +0000 From: Pointer Events Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> Reply-To: Pointer Events Working Group <public-pointer-events@w3.org> To: public-pointer-events@w3.org ACTION-141: Check with philippe if the runner test reporting mechanism is ok for cr http://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/141 Assigned to: Doug Schepers
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 20:44:07 UTC