Implementation Report [Was: ACTION-141 ...]

Hi Philippe,

During the October 21 Pointer Events WG call [1], we discussed formal CR 
testing. The group agreed to try to use the w-p-t "runner" [2] and to 
put test results in [3] (not yet created).

We haven't yet agreed on the structure and format of the Implementation 
Report. One option we discussed is to use the wptreport tool [4]. Do you 
recommend using that tool for our Implementation Report (f.ex. see [5])? 
If not, we would appreciate your recommendations on any other tool to 
use and/or example Implementation Reports you would recommend us pattern.

-Thanks, ArtB

[1] <http://www.w3.org/2014/10/21-pointerevents-minutes.html#item04>
[2] <http://w3c-test.org/tools/runner/index.html>
[3] <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/tree/gh-pages/pointerevents>
[4] <https://www.npmjs.org/package/wptreport>
[5] <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/IndexedDB/all.html>

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	ACTION-141: Check with philippe if the runner test reporting 
mechanism is ok for cr
Resent-Date: 	Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:28:52 +0000
Resent-From: 	public-pointer-events@w3.org
Date: 	Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:28:51 +0000
From: 	Pointer Events Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Reply-To: 	Pointer Events Working Group <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
To: 	public-pointer-events@w3.org



ACTION-141: Check with philippe if the runner test reporting mechanism is ok for cr

http://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/141

Assigned to: Doug Schepers

Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 20:44:07 UTC