Re: Implementation Report [Was: ACTION-141 ...]

On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 16:43 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
> 
> During the October 21 Pointer Events WG call [1], we discussed formal CR 
> testing. The group agreed to try to use the w-p-t "runner" [2] and to 
> put test results in [3] (not yet created).
>
> We haven't yet agreed on the structure and format of the Implementation 
> Report. One option we discussed is to use the wptreport tool [4]. Do you 
> recommend using that tool for our Implementation Report (f.ex. see [5])?
>
> If not, we would appreciate your recommendations on any other tool to 
> use and/or example Implementation Reports you would recommend us pattern.

That tool was good enough for HTML5 and DOM. I don't have an alternative
to propose so, sure, use that one.

Philippe

> -Thanks, ArtB
> 
> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2014/10/21-pointerevents-minutes.html#item04>
> [2] <http://w3c-test.org/tools/runner/index.html>
> [3] <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/tree/gh-pages/pointerevents>
> [4] <https://www.npmjs.org/package/wptreport>
> [5] <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/IndexedDB/all.html>
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:  ACTION-141: Check with philippe if the runner test reporting 
> mechanism is ok for cr
> Resent-Date:  Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:28:52 +0000
> Resent-From:  public-pointer-events@w3.org
> Date:  Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:28:51 +0000
> From:  Pointer Events Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
> Reply-To:  Pointer Events Working Group <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
> To:  public-pointer-events@w3.org
> 
> 
> 
> ACTION-141: Check with philippe if the runner test reporting mechanism is ok for cr
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/141
> 
> Assigned to: Doug Schepers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 20:51:29 UTC