W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > April to June 2014

No PEWG call on June 17

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 06:56:23 -0400
Message-ID: <53A01ED7.7060009@gmail.com>
To: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
Hi All - sorry for the late notice but there will be no PEWG call on 
June 17. Let's do plan to have a call on June 24.

Regarding completing the test suite, Scott's email below provides some 
of the related actions for some open PRs. We should all follow up on 
that thread.

Another test related action is to update the Test Status column of 
[TestAssertions]. If we now have a merged test, the status could be 
labeled something like "Yes" and then link directly to the "live" test 
in [w-p-t] or its location on the [master] branch. WDYT? Is anyone 
willing to do this?

-Thanks, AB

[TestAssertions] <https://www.w3.org/wiki/PointerEvents/TestAssertions>
[w-p-t] <http://w3c-test.org/pointerevents>
[master] 
<https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/pointerevents>


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: ACTION-108: Send a todo list re testing that needs to be 
done (Pointer Events Working Group)
Resent-Date: 	Sat, 14 Jun 2014 01:18:18 +0000
Resent-From: 	public-pointer-events@w3.org
Date: 	Fri, 13 Jun 2014 21:17:49 -0400
From: 	Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>
To: 	Pointer Events Working Group <public-pointer-events@w3.org>



I believe the following is the full list of assertions from the TTWF 
event that haven't been already implemented in web-platform-tests.

TA 3.1, 3.2 - pointerup properties matching pointerdown properties
https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointerup.html#L133
We do have the equivalent tests for pointermove (5.1, 5.2) 
in pointerevent_pointermove_isprimary_same_as_pointerdown.html

TA 12.1 - constructor assertions
https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/master/constructor.html

There are more extensive pointerleave tests with deeply nested elements, 
but I'm not sure if this is necessary:
https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/master/pointerenterleave-continuous.html

gotpointercapture and lostpointercapture events should be fired 
asynchronously. There is no Test Assertion for this, but this is covered 
by https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24971
gotpointercapture: 
https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointercaptureevents.html#L106
lostpointercapture: 
https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointercaptureevents.html#L129




On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Pointer Events Working Group Issue 
Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org>> wrote:

    ACTION-108: Send a todo list re testing that needs to be done
    (Pointer Events Working Group)

    http://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/108

    On: Scott González
    Due: 2014-06-10

    If you do not want to be notified on new action items for this
    group, please update your settings at:
    http://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/users/50558#settings
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 10:56:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:20:26 UTC