- From: Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 21:17:49 -0400
- To: Pointer Events Working Group <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAO8i3idc50NV0xKyTst31jY6-N6hpH4txYhvC29=S_B4JSeu9g@mail.gmail.com>
I believe the following is the full list of assertions from the TTWF event that haven't been already implemented in web-platform-tests. TA 3.1, 3.2 - pointerup properties matching pointerdown properties https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointerup.html#L133 We do have the equivalent tests for pointermove (5.1, 5.2) in pointerevent_pointermove_isprimary_same_as_pointerdown.html TA 12.1 - constructor assertions https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/master/constructor.html There are more extensive pointerleave tests with deeply nested elements, but I'm not sure if this is necessary: https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/master/pointerenterleave-continuous.html gotpointercapture and lostpointercapture events should be fired asynchronously. There is no Test Assertion for this, but this is covered by https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24971 gotpointercapture: https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointercaptureevents.html#L106 lostpointercapture: https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointercaptureevents.html#L129 On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Pointer Events Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > ACTION-108: Send a todo list re testing that needs to be done (Pointer > Events Working Group) > > http://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/108 > > On: Scott González > Due: 2014-06-10 > > If you do not want to be notified on new action items for this group, > please update your settings at: > http://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/users/50558#settings > >
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2014 01:18:16 UTC