W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: ACTION-108: Send a todo list re testing that needs to be done (Pointer Events Working Group)

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:24:02 -0400
Message-ID: <53A03362.3000103@gmail.com>
To: Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>, Pointer Events Working Group <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
On 6/13/14 9:17 PM, Scott González wrote:
> I believe the following is the full list of assertions from the TTWF 
> event that haven't been already implemented in web-platform-tests.
> TA 3.1, 3.2 - pointerup properties matching pointerdown properties
> https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointerup.html#L133
> We do have the equivalent tests for pointermove (5.1, 5.2) 
> in pointerevent_pointermove_isprimary_same_as_pointerdown.html

What's the plan/recommendation? Are you or Dave going to resubmit the 
test file or update one of the merged files?

> TA 12.1 - constructor assertions
> https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/master/constructor.html

What's the plan here? Do we need someone to review this?

> There are more extensive pointerleave tests with deeply nested 
> elements, but I'm not sure if this is necessary:
> https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/master/pointerenterleave-continuous.html

Perhaps one option for tests like these is to tag them with something 
like `stress test` and thus distinguish it as something that isn't 
strictly need to "test the Candidate Recommendation". WDYT?

> gotpointercapture and lostpointercapture events should be fired 
> asynchronously. There is no Test Assertion for this, but this is 
> covered by https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24971
> gotpointercapture: 
> https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointercaptureevents.html#L106
> lostpointercapture: 
> https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointercaptureevents.html#L129

So it sounds like we need someone to review this and when all issues are 
resolved to merge it?

-Thanks, Art
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 12:24:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:20:26 UTC