W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Added assertion for pointerenter event

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:54:07 -0400
Message-ID: <5170252F.4010408@nokia.com>
To: Dave Methvin <dave.methvin@gmail.com>, Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@mozilla.com>
CC: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
On 4/16/13 1:21 PM, ext Dave Methvin wrote:
> Arthur, I was planning on making a pass through all the contributions 
> to give them a consistent style and break out some of the redundant 
> code into a reusable module.

That sounds like a great idea.

> Let me know where you'd like this to go.

Well, that's a bit of an open question at the moment because currently, 
we have a few test submissions in Mercurial/Hg ([PE-Hg]) and some PRs in 
GitHub.

We have an open Call for Consensus that proposes we move our testing to 
GitHub (and no longer use Mercurial) and that CfC ends April 22.

If you don't want to block on that CfC, then re your "where" question 
above, it seems like GH would be best.

Matt Brubeck agreed to be the "Test Facilitator" for the Pointer Events 
spec so I would like to hear his opinion, e.g. on the "where" question 
as well as the organization you plan to do.

-ArtB

[PE-Hg] 
<http://w3c-test.org/pointerevents/tests/pointerevents-v1/submissions/>
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 16:54:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:20:25 UTC