- From: Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:32:11 -0400
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAO8i3iexj3sYYF0LKpWtRrUf12XL05RuHtWbfoEXzab2V7cNcQ@mail.gmail.com>
I support moving to GitHub. On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote: > During our April 16 call, the topic of moving our tests to GitHub was > raised and I said I would followup on the list. > > Although there are some advantages to keeping our tests in Mercurial/Hg, > overall, I think the advantages of moving to GH are greater. (And please > note that given the PRs from last weekend's TTWF event, I believe there are > actually more public PointerEvents tests in GH than Mercurial/Hg ;-)). > > To determine people's position on this question, this is Call for > Consensus (CfC) to move our tests to GH, i.e. to use < > https://github.com/w3c/web-**platform-tests/tree/master/**PointerEvents<https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/PointerEvents>> > for all of the group's tests. > > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to this > e-mail by April 22 at the latest. Positive response is preferred and > encouraged, and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. > > FYI, Rebecca Hauck created a really nice tutorial for submitting tests on > GH <http://testthewebforward.org/**github_test_submission.html<http://testthewebforward.org/github_test_submission.html>>. > My expectation is that this document (or something like it, perhaps > streamlined for our group) will serve as a submission guide for ourselves > as well as others that want to contribute tests for our spec. > > -Thanks, AB > > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 16:32:38 UTC