Re: CfC: move tests to GitHub; deadline April 22

I support moving to GitHub.


On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote:

> During our April 16 call, the topic of moving our tests to GitHub was
> raised and I said I would followup on the list.
>
> Although there are some advantages to keeping our tests in Mercurial/Hg,
> overall, I think the advantages of moving to GH are greater. (And please
> note that given the PRs from last weekend's TTWF event, I believe there are
> actually more public PointerEvents tests in GH than Mercurial/Hg ;-)).
>
> To determine people's position on this question, this is Call for
> Consensus (CfC) to move our tests to GH, i.e. to use <
> https://github.com/w3c/web-**platform-tests/tree/master/**PointerEvents<https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/PointerEvents>>
> for all of the group's tests.
>
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to this
> e-mail by April 22 at the latest. Positive response is preferred and
> encouraged, and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal.
>
> FYI, Rebecca Hauck created a really nice tutorial for submitting tests on
> GH <http://testthewebforward.org/**github_test_submission.html<http://testthewebforward.org/github_test_submission.html>>.
> My expectation is that this document (or something like it, perhaps
> streamlined for our group) will serve as a submission guide for ourselves
> as well as others that want to contribute tests for our spec.
>
> -Thanks, AB
>
>
>
>