Re: CfC: move tests to GitHub; deadline April 22

I support moving to GitHub.

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Arthur Barstow <>wrote:

> During our April 16 call, the topic of moving our tests to GitHub was
> raised and I said I would followup on the list.
> Although there are some advantages to keeping our tests in Mercurial/Hg,
> overall, I think the advantages of moving to GH are greater. (And please
> note that given the PRs from last weekend's TTWF event, I believe there are
> actually more public PointerEvents tests in GH than Mercurial/Hg ;-)).
> To determine people's position on this question, this is Call for
> Consensus (CfC) to move our tests to GH, i.e. to use <
> for all of the group's tests.
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to this
> e-mail by April 22 at the latest. Positive response is preferred and
> encouraged, and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal.
> FYI, Rebecca Hauck created a really nice tutorial for submitting tests on
> GH <**github_test_submission.html<>>.
> My expectation is that this document (or something like it, perhaps
> streamlined for our group) will serve as a submission guide for ourselves
> as well as others that want to contribute tests for our spec.
> -Thanks, AB

Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 16:32:38 UTC