- From: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:46:43 -0800
- To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- CC: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <545D0583.7000105@oracle.com>
I'd put it on window so it inherits to alertdialog too. But other than that +1 On 11/7/2014 9:24 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote: > I'm up for role="dialog" + aria-modal="true" approach. > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger > <schwer@us.ibm.com <mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com>> wrote: > > Sounds like we agree that aria-inert should be dropped. Anyone > disagree? > > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > > Inactive hide details for "james.nurthen@oracle.com" ---11/06/2014 > 09:24:15 PM---I agree. While I think event silencing and > foc"james.nurthen@oracle.com <mailto:james.nurthen@oracle.com>" > ---11/06/2014 09:24:15 PM---I agree. While I think event silencing > and focus management are a useful feature they are not approp > > From: "james.nurthen@oracle.com <mailto:james.nurthen@oracle.com>" > <james.nurthen@oracle.com <mailto:james.nurthen@oracle.com>> > To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com <mailto:jcraig@apple.com>> > Cc: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com > <mailto:dmazzoni@google.com>>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats > <public-pfwg@w3.org <mailto:public-pfwg@w3.org>> > Date: 11/06/2014 09:24 PM > Subject: Re: aria-modal (Was: @inert and @aria-inert for > disambiguating modal states) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > I agree. While I think event silencing and focus management are a > useful feature they are not appropriate for an aria- attribute. > As far as I can see aria-modal solves the problem at hand and I > see no reason to have an aria-inert. > > > On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:36 PM, James Craig <_jcraig@apple.com_ > <mailto:jcraig@apple.com>> wrote: > > @aria-modal would not do the focus management and event > silencing that @inert would, but a new @aria-inert attr would > not be able to do that either. > > > On Nov 6, 2014, at 12:59 PM, James Nurthen > <_james.nurthen@oracle.com_ <mailto:james.nurthen@oracle.com>> > wrote: > In that case I see no need for aria-inert. > > Are there other use cases that ACTION-1347 would not address? > > Regards, > James > > > On 11/6/2014 12:52 PM, James Craig wrote: > On Nov 6, 2014, at 12:44 PM, Dominic Mazzoni > _<dmazzoni@google.com>_ > <mailto:dmazzoni@google.com> wrote: > > Agreed, I'd love to see @aria-modal to go with > role=dialog. Obviously the html5 dialog element is > even better, but not all browsers support that yet. > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:40 PM, James Nurthen > _<james.nurthen@oracle.com>_ > <mailto:james.nurthen@oracle.com> wrote: > I see the need for a developer to state whether their > dialogs are modal or not. > We have a 1.1 action for that. > > ACTION-1347: Add an attribute for differentiating > modal vs non-modal dialogs/menus/etc. (possibly > aria-modal) > _https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1347_ > > > -- > Regards, James > > _<oracle_sig_logo.gif>_ <http://www.oracle.com/> > James Nurthen | Principal Engineer, Accessibility > Phone: _+1 650 506 6781_ <tel:+1%20650%20506%206781> | > Mobile: _+1 415 987 1918_ <tel:+1%20415%20987%201918> > Oracle Corporate Architecture > 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065_ > __<green-for-email-sig_0.gif>_ > <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>Oracle is committed to > developing practices and products that help protect the > environment > > -- Regards, James Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> James Nurthen | Principal Engineer, Accessibility Phone: +1 650 506 6781 <tel:+1%20650%20506%206781> | Mobile: +1 415 987 1918 <tel:+1%20415%20987%201918> Oracle Corporate Architecture 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 17:47:20 UTC