- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:12:47 -0600
- To: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
- Cc: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <OF4618BB0C.3D9A79E5-ON86257D89.006F066A-86257D89.006F08C0@us.ibm.com>
+1 Rich Schwerdtfeger From: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com> To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Cc: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org> Date: 11/07/2014 11:47 AM Subject: Re: aria-modal (Was: @inert and @aria-inert for disambiguating modal states) I'd put it on window so it inherits to alertdialog too. But other than that +1 On 11/7/2014 9:24 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote: I'm up for role="dialog" + aria-modal="true" approach. On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger < schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote: Sounds like we agree that aria-inert should be dropped. Anyone disagree? Rich Schwerdtfeger Inactive hide details for "james.nurthen@oracle.com" ---11/06/2014 09:24:15 PM---I agree. While I think event silencing and foc"james.nurthen@oracle.com" ---11/06/2014 09:24:15 PM---I agree. While I think event silencing and focus management are a useful feature they are not approp From: "james.nurthen@oracle.com" <james.nurthen@oracle.com> To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> Cc: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org> Date: 11/06/2014 09:24 PM Subject: Re: aria-modal (Was: @inert and @aria-inert for disambiguating modal states) I agree. While I think event silencing and focus management are a useful feature they are not appropriate for an aria- attribute. As far as I can see aria-modal solves the problem at hand and I see no reason to have an aria-inert. On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:36 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: @aria-modal would not do the focus management and event silencing that @inert would, but a new @aria-inert attr would not be able to do that either. On Nov 6, 2014, at 12:59 PM, James Nurthen < james.nurthen@oracle.com> wrote: In that case I see no need for aria-inert. Are there other use cases that ACTION-1347 would not address? Regards, James On 11/6/2014 12:52 PM, James Craig wrote: On Nov 6, 2014, at 12:44 PM, Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com> wrote: Agreed, I'd love to see @aria-modal to go with role=dialog. Obviously the html5 dialog element is even better, but not all browsers support that yet. On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:40 PM, James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com> wrote: I see the need for a developer to state whether their dialogs are modal or not. We have a 1.1 action for that. ACTION-1347: Add an attribute for differentiating modal vs non-modal dialogs/menus/etc. (possibly aria-modal) https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1347 -- Regards, James <oracle_sig_logo.gif> James Nurthen | Principal Engineer, Accessibility Phone: +1 650 506 6781 | Mobile: +1 415 987 1918 Oracle Corporate Architecture 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 <green-for-email-sig_0.gif> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment -- Regards, James Oracle James Nurthen | Principal Engineer, Accessibility Phone: +1 650 506 6781 | Mobile: +1 415 987 1918 Oracle Corporate Architecture 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 Green OracleOracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: 37373356.gif
- image/gif attachment: 37595354.gif
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 20:13:20 UTC