- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:12:47 -0600
- To: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
- Cc: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <OF4618BB0C.3D9A79E5-ON86257D89.006F066A-86257D89.006F08C0@us.ibm.com>
+1
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>, Richard
Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, James Craig
<jcraig@apple.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats
<public-pfwg@w3.org>
Date: 11/07/2014 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: aria-modal (Was: @inert and @aria-inert for disambiguating
modal states)
I'd put it on window so it inherits to alertdialog too.
But other than that +1
On 11/7/2014 9:24 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
I'm up for role="dialog" + aria-modal="true" approach.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <
schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
Sounds like we agree that aria-inert should be dropped. Anyone
disagree?
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Inactive hide details for
"james.nurthen@oracle.com" ---11/06/2014
09:24:15
PM---I agree. While I think event silencing
and
foc"james.nurthen@oracle.com" ---11/06/2014 09:24:15 PM---I agree.
While I think event silencing and focus management are a useful
feature they are not approp
From: "james.nurthen@oracle.com" <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
Cc: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, W3C WAI Protocols &
Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Date: 11/06/2014 09:24 PM
Subject: Re: aria-modal (Was: @inert and @aria-inert for
disambiguating modal states)
I agree. While I think event silencing and focus management are a
useful feature they are not appropriate for an aria- attribute.
As far as I can see aria-modal solves the problem at hand and I see
no reason to have an aria-inert.
On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:36 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:
@aria-modal would not do the focus management and event
silencing that @inert would, but a new @aria-inert attr would
not be able to do that either.
On Nov 6, 2014, at 12:59 PM, James Nurthen <
james.nurthen@oracle.com> wrote:
In that case I see no need for aria-inert.
Are there other use cases that ACTION-1347 would not
address?
Regards,
James
On 11/6/2014 12:52 PM, James Craig wrote:
On Nov 6, 2014, at 12:44 PM, Dominic Mazzoni
<dmazzoni@google.com> wrote:
Agreed, I'd love to see @aria-modal to go with
role=dialog. Obviously the html5 dialog element
is even better, but not all browsers support that
yet.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:40 PM, James Nurthen
<james.nurthen@oracle.com> wrote:
I see the need for a developer to state whether
their dialogs are modal or not.
We have a 1.1 action for that.
ACTION-1347: Add an attribute for differentiating
modal vs non-modal dialogs/menus/etc. (possibly
aria-modal)
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1347
--
Regards, James
<oracle_sig_logo.gif>
James Nurthen | Principal Engineer, Accessibility
Phone: +1 650 506 6781 | Mobile: +1 415 987 1918
Oracle Corporate Architecture
500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065
<green-for-email-sig_0.gif> Oracle is committed to
developing practices and products that help protect the
environment
--
Regards, James
Oracle
James Nurthen | Principal Engineer, Accessibility
Phone: +1 650 506 6781 | Mobile: +1 415 987 1918
Oracle Corporate Architecture
500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065
Green
OracleOracle is committed to developing practices and
products that help protect the environment
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: 37373356.gif
- image/gif attachment: 37595354.gif
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 20:13:20 UTC