- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:38:20 -0400
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
> > Remove EdNote on GRDDL.
>
> I did that, because AFAIK we did decide exactly what to do about
> GRDDL (see http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/97). It was
> subsequently determined that we can have multiple transforms, and
> also that Sandro will develop a suitable XSLT (with some technical
> help from Bijan). Others may have a different view?
While that's all true, we did agree (although not "resolve") in a
telecon to add that note AFTER we had closed the issue and settled on
our current course of action. I think it was Bijan who was arguing for
this ednote, though, so if he doesn't have a problem with removing it,
then... okay.
> > 2.4/ Profiles:
> >
> > Remove Figure 2, as it serves no useful purpose.
I'm tempted to bet folks a drink that we'll get complaints about
removing it, but whatever....
> > 3/ Differences
> >
> > Could remove the subsection headers, as the subsections are all very
> > short.
> >
> >
> > Change "albeit under a possibly different name." to
> > "albeit possibly under different names."
> >
> > Remove "; it also has a formal equivalence to UML [UML]."
> > This is just *wrong*.
> >
> > 3.2:
> > Just put this stuff elsewhere (perhaps in Primer).
>
> I significantly shortened the whole of Section 3 and pointed to NF&R
> for detailed explanation/documentation.
>
> I also renamed it "Relationship to OWL 1" as this seems more
> appropriate and avoids the negative connotations of "differences".
Very nice, except that we need a link explaining the "almost"s in
paragraph two to a place with text like Peter and I were crafting
yesterday. If I were an OWL 2 user, I would insist the text actually be
normative, too. (I guess there's no problem with a little normative
text in NF&R.)
Am I the only one who thinks OWL 1 users will want to know, in no
uncertain terms, whether OWL 2 breaks their stuff, BEFORE they accept
OWL 2? Figuring that out by sifting through our entire spec seems a bit
much to ask.
-- Sandro
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 12:38:28 UTC