- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:38:20 -0400
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
> > Remove EdNote on GRDDL. > > I did that, because AFAIK we did decide exactly what to do about > GRDDL (see http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/97). It was > subsequently determined that we can have multiple transforms, and > also that Sandro will develop a suitable XSLT (with some technical > help from Bijan). Others may have a different view? While that's all true, we did agree (although not "resolve") in a telecon to add that note AFTER we had closed the issue and settled on our current course of action. I think it was Bijan who was arguing for this ednote, though, so if he doesn't have a problem with removing it, then... okay. > > 2.4/ Profiles: > > > > Remove Figure 2, as it serves no useful purpose. I'm tempted to bet folks a drink that we'll get complaints about removing it, but whatever.... > > 3/ Differences > > > > Could remove the subsection headers, as the subsections are all very > > short. > > > > > > Change "albeit under a possibly different name." to > > "albeit possibly under different names." > > > > Remove "; it also has a formal equivalence to UML [UML]." > > This is just *wrong*. > > > > 3.2: > > Just put this stuff elsewhere (perhaps in Primer). > > I significantly shortened the whole of Section 3 and pointed to NF&R > for detailed explanation/documentation. > > I also renamed it "Relationship to OWL 1" as this seems more > appropriate and avoids the negative connotations of "differences". Very nice, except that we need a link explaining the "almost"s in paragraph two to a place with text like Peter and I were crafting yesterday. If I were an OWL 2 user, I would insist the text actually be normative, too. (I guess there's no problem with a little normative text in NF&R.) Am I the only one who thinks OWL 1 users will want to know, in no uncertain terms, whether OWL 2 breaks their stuff, BEFORE they accept OWL 2? Figuring that out by sifting through our entire spec seems a bit much to ask. -- Sandro
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 12:38:28 UTC