Re: review of Document Overview

On 2 Apr 2009, at 13:38, Sandro Hawke wrote:

>
>>> Remove EdNote on GRDDL.
>>
>> I did that, because AFAIK we did decide exactly what to do about
>> GRDDL (see http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/97). It was
>> subsequently determined that we can have multiple transforms, and
>> also that Sandro will develop a suitable XSLT (with some technical
>> help from Bijan). Others may have a different view?
>
> While that's all true, we did agree (although not "resolve") in a
> telecon to add that note AFTER we had closed the issue and settled on
> our current course of action.

Really? That's not my recollection.

> I think it was Bijan who was arguing for
> this ednote, though, so if he doesn't have a problem with removing it,
> then... okay.

Nuke it.

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 13:20:34 UTC