- From: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:08:49 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
2009/4/2 Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>: > >> > 3.2: >> > Just put this stuff elsewhere (perhaps in Primer). >> >> I significantly shortened the whole of Section 3 and pointed to NF&R >> for detailed explanation/documentation. >> >> I also renamed it "Relationship to OWL 1" as this seems more >> appropriate and avoids the negative connotations of "differences". > > Very nice, except that we need a link explaining the "almost"s in > paragraph two to a place with text like Peter and I were crafting > yesterday. If I were an OWL 2 user, I would insist the text actually be > normative, too. (I guess there's no problem with a little normative > text in NF&R.) Agree, as proposed, we'll put some like text in NF&R (as a whole or splitted) > -- Sandro > > -- Christine
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 07:09:29 UTC