- From: Jerven Bolleman <jerven.bolleman@sib.swiss>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:25:39 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bijan.parsia@manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: "public-owl-comments@w3.org" <public-owl-comments@w3.org>, "public-owl-dev@w3.org" <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Hi Bijan, Thanks for the quick answer. For my curiosity, why didn't you think making them resolvable was a good idea. Sorry to bother, but searching the mailinglist doesn't get me anywhere and now I am super curious. Regards, Jerven On 1/16/20 10:58 AM, Bijan Parsia wrote: > I don’t think it was an oversight per se. I certainly didn’t think making them resolvable was a good idea. > >> On Jan 16, 2020, at 09:53, Jerven Tjalling Bolleman <Jerven.Bolleman@sib.swiss> wrote: >> >> Dear OWL community, >> >> I just noticed that the two new datatypes introduced into OWL2 real and rational are not resolvable. >> >> i.e. www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#rational does not exist >> >> Was this an oversight when updating that file during the OWL2 work? >> The datatypes are mentioned in https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Real_Numbers.2C_Decimal_Numbers.2C_and_Integers >> >> Regards, >> Jerven >> >> >> -- >> Jerven Tjalling Bolleman >> SIB | Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics >> CMU - 1, rue Michel Servet - 1211 Geneva 4 >> t: +41 22 379 58 85 - f: +41 22 379 58 58 >> Jerven.Bolleman@sib.swiss - http://www.sib.swiss >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2020 10:25:57 UTC