- From: Bijan Parsia <bijan.parsia@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:58:32 +0000
- To: "Jerven.Bolleman@sib.swiss" <Jerven.Bolleman@sib.swiss>
- CC: "public-owl-comments@w3.org" <public-owl-comments@w3.org>, "public-owl-dev@w3.org" <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
I don’t think it was an oversight per se. I certainly didn’t think making them resolvable was a good idea. > On Jan 16, 2020, at 09:53, Jerven Tjalling Bolleman <Jerven.Bolleman@sib.swiss> wrote: > > Dear OWL community, > > I just noticed that the two new datatypes introduced into OWL2 real and rational are not resolvable. > > i.e. www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#rational does not exist > > Was this an oversight when updating that file during the OWL2 work? > The datatypes are mentioned in https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Real_Numbers.2C_Decimal_Numbers.2C_and_Integers > > Regards, > Jerven > > > -- > Jerven Tjalling Bolleman > SIB | Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics > CMU - 1, rue Michel Servet - 1211 Geneva 4 > t: +41 22 379 58 85 - f: +41 22 379 58 58 > Jerven.Bolleman@sib.swiss - http://www.sib.swiss > >
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2020 09:58:42 UTC