Re: Issue 81: Separating audio and video capabilities

Presumably it would be to allow expanded definition beyond audio/video 
in the future without expanding the surface of the API. If this could 
only ever be applicable to audio/video I would agree. I'm not certain 
(yet) that is true.

-Robin


> cowwoc <mailto:cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
> May 19, 2014 at 11:51 AM
> Again, why? What is gained by this approach over using separate 
> methods for each type?
>
> Gili
>
> On 19/05/2014 8:49 AM, Peter Thatcher wrote:
>
> Peter Thatcher <mailto:pthatcher@google.com>
> May 19, 2014 at 8:49 AM
> It can be an enum.
>