- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 11:51:51 -0400
- To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
- CC: "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 15:52:30 UTC
Again, why? What is gained by this approach over using separate methods
for each type?
Gili
On 19/05/2014 8:49 AM, Peter Thatcher wrote:
> It can be an enum.
>
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:53 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org
> <mailto:cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>> wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2014 1:12 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>
> Peter Thatcher said:
>
> "I'd be happy with
>
> .getCapabilities() => returns combined audio+video capabilities
> .getCapabilities("audio") => returns audio capabilities
> .getCapabilities("video") => returns video capabilities"
>
> [BA] Works for me.
>
> How about getAudioCapabilities(), getVideoCapabilities() in order
> to maintain compile-time safety? I don't think using Strings buys
> you anything here.
>
> Gili
>
>
Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 15:52:30 UTC