Re: ORTC logo - donated by Hookflash

Ok, so it sounds like you are most interested in seeing the various browser
colors reflected in the design?

If I can get a clear understand in terms of what your expectations are then
maybe I will take another stab at it.

*Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> |
*Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* |
1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> *


On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> Understood. I just wanted to make sure that in the desire to do that we
> didn't hinder our overall goals.
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote:
>
>> Does the current webrtc.org logo belong to the W3C or IETF WGs or is it
>> open source MIT license or what is the deal there?
>>
>> One of my concerns was that if we used that logo as a stepping off point
>> there would be trademark or the same IPR concerns.
>>
>> Yes, also not interested in beating this to death, was just trying to do
>> something nice for the CG frankly.
>>
>> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* |
>> 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> *
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>wrote:
>>
>>> The WebRTC logo was designed to be all-encompassing; each circle in the
>>> logo was meant to represent one of the five major browsers.
>>>
>>> While there may have been unconscious bias, I can say that the logo was
>>> never intended to be Chrome-centric, and I don't really see how it could be
>>> considered so.
>>>
>>> I don't really want to spend a lot of CG time arguing this, but I did
>>> want to make the intent clear.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you ask me, the current webrtc logo is a bit Chrome-centric, which
>>>> for some may seem a wee bit biased, considering Google is not the only
>>>> vendor at the table?
>>>>
>>>> We were going for a simple / generic approach, still not sure why that
>>>> is so bad but happy to look at whatever you would like to propose.
>>>>
>>>> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* |
>>>> 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
>>>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I certainly understand the desire to have a flag, but I think it is
>>>>> likely to reinforce the incorrect message that this is something that
>>>>> competes with WebRTC 1.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the ORTC logo should be a derivative of the existing WebRTC
>>>>> logo.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, we could have spent double the time and resources but
>>>>>> considering the CG has no logo at all right now could we live with it until
>>>>>> something else is proposed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Btw, that's a chat bubble inside the camera.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Erik Lagerway - m. 604.562.8647
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 8, 2014, at 11:53 AM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No offense, but it looks a little generic to me.  There are a lot of
>>>>>> video chat logos that all look the same.  I can't complain too much because
>>>>>> I don't have a logo to propose myself, but something a little more
>>>>>> meaningful would be nice.  For example, ORTC is not just about video, and
>>>>>> it has advantages over WebRTC 1.0 that aren't expressed at all by the logo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps some kind of graph that both conveys  objects (Object) and
>>>>>> connectedness (RTC) at the same time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Gili.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks like there is no opposition to using this as the CG logo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* |
>>>>>>> 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
>>>>>>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 7:42 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Looks nice :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gili
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 07/05/2014 7:18 PM, Erik Lagerway wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  We thought it might be nice if the ORTC CG had a logo, so the
>>>>>>>> design team at Hookflash created one. We would like to donate the work and
>>>>>>>> assets to the W3C ORTC Community Group. Let us know what you think!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  The assets can be found here:
>>>>>>>> http://ortc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ortc-logo.zip
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  /Erik
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* |
>>>>>>>> 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
>>>>>>>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>