- From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 18:41:55 -0700
- To: Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>
- Cc: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-0g1YFpf5SZ4AZfJk==qtOHktCKjK1xjDgZ_UHQpWAWaA@mail.gmail.com>
Understood. I just wanted to make sure that in the desire to do that we didn't hinder our overall goals. On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote: > Does the current webrtc.org logo belong to the W3C or IETF WGs or is it > open source MIT license or what is the deal there? > > One of my concerns was that if we used that logo as a stepping off point > there would be trademark or the same IPR concerns. > > Yes, also not interested in beating this to death, was just trying to do > something nice for the CG frankly. > > *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* | > 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter > <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> * > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote: > >> The WebRTC logo was designed to be all-encompassing; each circle in the >> logo was meant to represent one of the five major browsers. >> >> While there may have been unconscious bias, I can say that the logo was >> never intended to be Chrome-centric, and I don't really see how it could be >> considered so. >> >> I don't really want to spend a lot of CG time arguing this, but I did >> want to make the intent clear. >> >> >> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote: >> >>> If you ask me, the current webrtc logo is a bit Chrome-centric, which >>> for some may seem a wee bit biased, considering Google is not the only >>> vendor at the table? >>> >>> We were going for a simple / generic approach, still not sure why that >>> is so bad but happy to look at whatever you would like to propose. >>> >>> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* | >>> 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter >>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> * >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>wrote: >>> >>>> I certainly understand the desire to have a flag, but I think it is >>>> likely to reinforce the incorrect message that this is something that >>>> competes with WebRTC 1.0. >>>> >>>> I think the ORTC logo should be a derivative of the existing WebRTC >>>> logo. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, we could have spent double the time and resources but considering >>>>> the CG has no logo at all right now could we live with it until something >>>>> else is proposed? >>>>> >>>>> Btw, that's a chat bubble inside the camera. >>>>> >>>>> Erik Lagerway - m. 604.562.8647 >>>>> >>>>> On May 8, 2014, at 11:53 AM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> No offense, but it looks a little generic to me. There are a lot of >>>>> video chat logos that all look the same. I can't complain too much because >>>>> I don't have a logo to propose myself, but something a little more >>>>> meaningful would be nice. For example, ORTC is not just about video, and >>>>> it has advantages over WebRTC 1.0 that aren't expressed at all by the logo. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps some kind of graph that both conveys objects (Object) and >>>>> connectedness (RTC) at the same time? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Gili. >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like there is no opposition to using this as the CG logo. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* | >>>>>> 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter >>>>>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> * >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 7:42 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Looks nice :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gili >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 07/05/2014 7:18 PM, Erik Lagerway wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We thought it might be nice if the ORTC CG had a logo, so the >>>>>>> design team at Hookflash created one. We would like to donate the work and >>>>>>> assets to the W3C ORTC Community Group. Let us know what you think! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The assets can be found here: >>>>>>> http://ortc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ortc-logo.zip >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Erik >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* | >>>>>>> 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter >>>>>>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> * >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2014 01:42:43 UTC