- From: Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 14:45:34 -0700
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- Cc: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPF_GTZ504fQAi0HRKsyk8ctz_dg+yE5Y44SBCKJ=V0B2M0VZg@mail.gmail.com>
If you ask me, the current webrtc logo is a bit Chrome-centric, which for some may seem a wee bit biased, considering Google is not the only vendor at the table? We were going for a simple / generic approach, still not sure why that is so bad but happy to look at whatever you would like to propose. *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> * On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote: > I certainly understand the desire to have a flag, but I think it is likely > to reinforce the incorrect message that this is something that competes > with WebRTC 1.0. > > I think the ORTC logo should be a derivative of the existing WebRTC logo. > > > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote: > >> Yes, we could have spent double the time and resources but considering >> the CG has no logo at all right now could we live with it until something >> else is proposed? >> >> Btw, that's a chat bubble inside the camera. >> >> Erik Lagerway - m. 604.562.8647 >> >> On May 8, 2014, at 11:53 AM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote: >> >> No offense, but it looks a little generic to me. There are a lot of >> video chat logos that all look the same. I can't complain too much because >> I don't have a logo to propose myself, but something a little more >> meaningful would be nice. For example, ORTC is not just about video, and >> it has advantages over WebRTC 1.0 that aren't expressed at all by the logo. >> >> >> Perhaps some kind of graph that both conveys objects (Object) and >> connectedness (RTC) at the same time? >> >> >> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>wrote: >> >>> Thanks Gili. >>> >>> Looks like there is no opposition to using this as the CG logo. >>> >>> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* | >>> 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter >>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> * >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 7:42 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Looks nice :) >>>> >>>> Gili >>>> >>>> >>>> On 07/05/2014 7:18 PM, Erik Lagerway wrote: >>>> >>>> We thought it might be nice if the ORTC CG had a logo, so the design >>>> team at Hookflash created one. We would like to donate the work and assets >>>> to the W3C ORTC Community Group. Let us know what you think! >>>> >>>> The assets can be found here: >>>> http://ortc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ortc-logo.zip >>>> >>>> /Erik >>>> >>>> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>* | >>>> 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter >>>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> * >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2014 21:46:09 UTC