Yes, we could have spent double the time and resources but considering the CG has no logo at all right now could we live with it until something else is proposed? Btw, that's a chat bubble inside the camera. Erik Lagerway - m. 604.562.8647 > On May 8, 2014, at 11:53 AM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote: > > No offense, but it looks a little generic to me. There are a lot of video chat logos that all look the same. I can't complain too much because I don't have a logo to propose myself, but something a little more meaningful would be nice. For example, ORTC is not just about video, and it has advantages over WebRTC 1.0 that aren't expressed at all by the logo. > > Perhaps some kind of graph that both conveys objects (Object) and connectedness (RTC) at the same time? > > >> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote: >> Thanks Gili. >> >> Looks like there is no opposition to using this as the CG logo. >> >> Erik Lagerway | Hookflash | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter | WebRTC.is Blog >> >> >>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 7:42 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: >>> Looks nice :) >>> >>> Gili >>> >>> >>>> On 07/05/2014 7:18 PM, Erik Lagerway wrote: >>>> We thought it might be nice if the ORTC CG had a logo, so the design team at Hookflash created one. We would like to donate the work and assets to the W3C ORTC Community Group. Let us know what you think! >>>> >>>> The assets can be found here: http://ortc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ortc-logo.zip >>>> >>>> /Erik >>>> >>>> Erik Lagerway | Hookflash | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter | WebRTC.is Blog >
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2014 19:01:19 UTC