- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:37:21 +0100
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Dear all, >> After much consideration and discussion, it was decided to change the >> namespace to: >> http://www.w3.org/ns/oa# > > A good choice. Excellent choice. >> The spec has been updated to reflect this change. The final question >> is if we can retroactively apply this to the spec of 2 days ago, or if >> we need a 20130207 version for this change? > > NO! That would just be evil - what would be the point of those version > numbers at all then? I agree, this is evil. > Also include a link to the OWL version quite separately at the top (by > relative IRI to "schema.xml") - specially as http://www.w3.org/ns/oa > is not there yet and would change in the future. Thus say > http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/20130208/schema.xml would stay > as it is. The .xml is misleading, why not putting a .rdf or .owl (as the standard practice by w3c)? Why not naming it 'oa' instead of 'schema'? For the final request of Ivan, getting an HTML (+RDFa) page for the spec, I find specgen very powerful and this is then very easy to generate your HTML version of the ontology, see https://bitbucket.org/wikier/specgen/wiki/Home which also lists all the other alternatives. Best regards. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech Multimedia Communications Department 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 10:37:52 UTC