- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:07:00 +0100
- To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Cc: t-cole3@illinois.edu, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: > And, to clarify, it is to be used as the identifier for the specific > resource *with* a Selector, rather than in place of it. The reasoning: the > URI is not obfuscated as it's in hasSource, conflation isn't really an issue > as the description is also available, and that it's explicitly only for when > there's a single selector. Why the requirement for a single selector? Did we not agree that the selectors are 'OR'-ed rather than 'AND'-ed? (Ie. they are alternative ways to select the same thing). The spec does not say anything about the interpretation of multiple states or multiple selectors. I think it should. And so there might be many ways to select a resource appearing in another (say image in web page), but I don't see that as a stopper for giving it a resolvable URI - ie. a URL. (remember: URI = URL union URN ) -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 13:07:47 UTC