Re: status of rdf schemas

As far as I know they're up to date for the current draft.  They don't
reflect the proposed changes for Style.  Also Stian has been
volunteered to work on an OWL version to clarify the details that
aren't expressable in plain RDFS.

After the September meeting (TBA very soon) we'll talk to the W3C
administration folk to get revised documents put up at the correct
namespace URI.

Please let us know if there are any issues that you run into with the mapping :)

Hope that helps!

Rob

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could we have some insight into the status of
>
> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/core-schema.xml
> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/extension/extension-schema.xml
>
> Are they deemed current to http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
> (resp. http://www.openannotation.org/spec/extension/)?.  I need to try
> to recode our usecase examples from AO to OA.
>
> Also, it would be really nice to be able to find these easily from the
> spec main pates.
>
> Thanks
> Bob
> --
> Robert A. Morris
>
> Emeritus Professor  of Computer Science
> UMASS-Boston
> 100 Morrissey Blvd
> Boston, MA 02125-3390
>
> IT Staff
> Filtered Push Project
> Harvard University Herbaria
> Harvard University
>
> email: morris.bob@gmail.com
> web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/
> web: http://etaxonomy.org/mw/FilteredPush
> http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
> ===
> The content of this communication is made entirely on my
> own behalf and in no way should be deemed to express
> official positions of The University of Massachusetts at Boston or
> Harvard University.
>

Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 16:54:37 UTC