Dear all, During the last telco of the FrAC module we had a use case-based discussion on ontolex:Form, with emphasis on the part of the specification that reads "Different forms are used to express different morphological forms of the entry. They should not be used to represent orthographical variants, which should be represented as different representations of the same form". Since this specific section of the guidelines may pose limitations in some use cases that would otherwise call for the use of ontolex:Form, a slight modification of these two sentences was proposed during the last FrAC telco. Details and general minutes are available here <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N2w_r6WLhFGESSMSUkG5FSROorXscDMQuB77qg9 uDIA/edit#heading=h.1chkbll88vam> , and some more context to that discussion is provided in this email thread <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ontolex/2021Mar/0009.html> . This potential minor revision of the guidelines regarding ontolex:Form could be a topic of discussion in the Face2Face meeting (already mentioned by Jorge in the tentative list of topics sent out today). In addition to the scenarios listed in the FrAC minutes document and the email thread mentioned above, if any of you have also encountered any similar limitations regarding the use of ontolex:Form for your particular use case, it could be great to keep track of them, too. Best and thank you, Julia -- Julia Bosque-Gil Aragon Institute of Engineering Research (I3A) University of Zaragoza Pronouns: she/her -- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2021 12:50:15 UTC