W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > June 2018

Re: citations etc

From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 12:16:39 +0200
To: public-ontolex@w3.org
Message-ID: <be94071b-b19f-860a-1100-122fe8cbde8d@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Dear all,

  thanks for this Ilan.

@All. I had planned a telco for today as I will not be available for the 
next two weeks.

And here is my proposed definition for an attestation:

Attestation: An attestation is a reference to a source that proves that 
the lexical entry has a certain linguistic property (e.g. a sense).

I propose we talk at 13:00 today to touch base and see how we continue 
our discussion on attestation.

Talk to you later,

Philipp.


Am 02.06.18 um 12:46 schrieb Ilan Kernerman:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Following our last call, here are some suggestions:
>
> ·A /citation/ consists of a quote from a corpus (text); it may either 
> (i) include a reference to its origin (/bibl/), or (ii) not.
>
> oAn /attestation/ is the reference to a source (/bibl/) without its 
> actual /citation/.
>
> §(in other words, /bibl/ and /attestation/ might be similar, but the 
> latter is not preceded by a /citation/)
>
> ·An /example of usage/ (or /usage example/) is human-crafted, whether 
> (i) corpus-inspired/derived, or (ii) not.
>
> oThe /example/ can consist of either a full sentence or a short phrase 
> (and could also be a /citation/)
>
> §(there are different types of examples – mainly of general patterns, 
> for reception/decoding purposes, active for production/encoding – but 
> that is probably beyond the scope here)
>
> This might seem like over-simplifying or distorting matters, but I 
> hope it is useful for more accurate mapping/tagging.
>
> I think this does not contradict the concerns raised in Fahad’s article J:
>
> “Lemon, unlike TEI-DICT, however focuses on capturing the conceptual 
> content of a lexicon, that is, it takes a primarily lexical view of 
> lexical resources… Hence there is no conflict here between the demands 
> of fidelity to the text in its lexical view and the text in its 
> editorial and typographical view as there is in TEI; lemon simply 
> prioritises the former.”
>
> “…a proper encoding of citations attesting to lexical properties must 
> take into consideration at least two different kinds of conceptual 
> entity: citations and attestations”
>
> Best,
>
> Ilan
>

-- 
Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
AG Semantic Computing
Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
Universität Bielefeld

Tel: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 6560
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Office CITEC-2.307
Universitätsstr. 21-25
33615 Bielefeld, NRW
Germany
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 10:17:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:37:01 UTC